Smart Luck Software

SmartLuck by Gail Howard is a great tool for a more calculated lottery pick. However, there is alot to learn about her processes and understanding what all the charts mean. After reading her books, I still have to return for a refresher.

So after I noticed the difference in the frequency of my wins, I decided to search the internet for blogs where people are charing their experiences with using the software and/or techniques they use and low and behold there was none. I’m not sure it this is the best kept secret, but I think sharing tips would not be such a big deal. So know I am here meandering around the blogging world to share and maybe gain new some new insights on using SmartLuck.

If you find this of any interest to you. post your findings here. Lottery systems can be fun when you are winning more than you are losing. For those who do not have any of the SmartLuck products; you may be able to pick up some pointers in the interum.

Powerball picks for Wednesday 1/5/2010

Here are the most probable (I feel) powerball numbers I have selected for Wednesday’s ping-pong pull. This table will display the number, play day where totals are highest and Why it was selected. There are more numbers that were good but those stood out as the most probable.

White Ball # Day Comment
12 Wed Been out 6 games w/a double hit and possible double bottom for hit #7.
32 Wed hot number- hit 5 time in last 20 games
5 Wed Stable hitting number due for a hit
13 Wed/Sat Hit 4 times in last 12 games and could be the tie breaker for Wed/Sat hits

Here are the other notable mentions: 12, 51, 16, 37, 21, 47, 23, 53

The number are running more on the high side lately and the ODD numbers are reigning.

Good luck until my next post.

Lottery numbers are not so random after all !

I have purchased and used Gail Howard’s lottery system software and I agree with the testimonials that numbers DO form patterns with sufficient data.

Since I have been using her systems, I have been winning about $30 per game by playing 10 tickets at $1 per ticket. Then I just keep using my winnings to play again. I have read “Lottery Master Guide” by Gail Howard and I agree with many readers that there are many charts to understand and master. In addition, I do have her software which makes the process easier and since using her software I have won more than before. She has done great work in creating something that can help millions of people if they are to the challenge and a little fun too.

Although there are many methods and charts she uses in the ‘Lottery Master Guide” ; I have discovered there is another missing piece that could be essential to her software. For anyone who has used the software the “History View Filter” comes close in finding which numbers play most frequently on specific game days. This feature works great but you have to run two instances of the program using different filters to see the differences in the total hits in each of the numbers. It would be great if total hits by day was displayed on the “Quick Pick chart”. The other drawback is when restoring back to the original settings, the user must be careful to not erase any game history. The potential is there if you are looking for it.

The funny thing is… I was one of the biggest skeptics since I had written my own version using access VBA and found that Gail Howard was right on the money.

Gail Howard claims:

“That which is MOST POSSIBLE happens MOST OFTEN.
That which is LEAST POSSIBLE happens LEAST OFTEN.”

So I tested the theory and she is most accurate. I tested a group of numbers that I have played in the past (they were not winners) to playing a new set every game and found that the numbers I had played in the past against the past 10 games were not even close. The new formulated sets of numbers for 5 games ($5.00) where closer to the point of getting all 5 numbers (on different panels) with the bonus number but, they did result in some winnings as opposed to playing the same numbers over and over again. Those old numbers had “sleepers” in them. They were not checked to see if they were “cold” numbers. So I would have lost money using those numbers repeatedly.

If there are others using her systems, please post your findings and I will do the same.